Fountain pen articles

Monday, September 10, 2012

Legal cases

UNDER HEAVY CONSTRUCTION
I will try to collect here "all" the legal cases related to fountain Pens. I need to sort things out of course. Please add corrections/additions in the comments.
Links on the name of the parties is to Federal Register (Google Books). Links on the case reference is to www.case-law.us or oPenjurist.org

Carter | Conklin | Crocker | Cross | Dunn | Eagle Pencil | Esterbrook | Hunt | John HollAnd | McKinnon | Misc | Montblanc | New Diamond Point | Papermate | Parker | Scripto | Sheaffer | Spencerian | Standard & Vulcanite | Star | Wahl-Eversharp | Waterman | Wirt

SHEAFFER

  1. In re Sheaffer's Estate, No. 377, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 240 Pa. 83; 87 A. 577; 1913 Pa. LEXIS 635, Feb. 12, 1913, Argued , March 24, 1913
  2. BARRETT et al. v. Sheaffer, No. 2519, Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 251 F. 74; 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1679, Jan. 2, 1918
  3. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Lucas, No. 4838, Court of Appeals of District of Columbia, 41 F.2d 117; 59 App. D.C. 323; 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2734; 5 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P1647; 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 10934, Argued Apr. 9, 1930 , May 5, 1930, Decided
  4. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 41 F.2d 820; 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2185, July 1, 1930
  5. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Eagle Pencil Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 55 F.2d 420; 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1953, December 3, 1931
  6. Katz Drug Co. v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., No. 1749, District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D., 6 F. Supp. 210; 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1435, Sep. 23, 1932
  7. Katz Drug Co. v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., No. 1749, District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D., 6 F. Supp. 212; 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1017, May 1, 1933
  8. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Coe, No. 63650, District Court of the United States For the District of Columbia, 27 F. Supp. 380; 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2911; 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 134, March 6, 1939
  9. re W. A. Sheaffer Pen Company, 72 US PQ 129 (CCPA, 1946)
  10. re General Permanent Wave Corporation, 118 F.2d 1020, 28 CCPA 1099 (1941)
  11. re General Permanent Wave Corporation, 158 F.2d 390, 34 CCPA 771 (1946)
  12. In re W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., No. 5211, UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS, 34 C.C.P.A. 771; 158 F.2d 390; 1946 CCPA LEXIS 556; 72 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 129, November 14, 1946, Oral argument by Mr. Rathburn and Mr. Federico , December 9, 1946, Decided
  13. Fremon, v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen CO., 209 F.2d 627, 100 U.S.P.Q. 203, No. 14819, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, Feb. 2, 1954.
  14. Ernst Johan Jens Henriksen And W. A. Sheaffer Pen Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Cory Corporation, Defendant-Appellant., 327 F.2d 409, No. 14070. United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. Jan. 20, 1964, Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1964

  15. Application of The REALISTIC COMPANY., 440 F.2d 1393, Patent Appeal No. 8529, United States Court of Customs And Patent Appeals. May 13, 1971.

  16. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Company, a Div. of Textron, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, 486 F.2d 180, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2456, 72 Lab.Cas. P 14,003, Nos. 72-1778, 73-1007. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1973. Decided Oct. 11, 1973. Rehearing And Rehearing En Banc Denied Nov. 20, 1973.
  17. Sheaffer v. Commissioner
    • W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 9408., United States Board of Tax Appeals, 9 B.T.A. 842; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2504, December 23, 1927, Promulgated
    • W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Commissioner, Docket Nos. 16788, 27036.,United States Board of Tax Appeals, 21 B.T.A. 661; 1930 BTA LEXIS 1814, December 12, 1930, Promulgated
    • W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Commissioner, Docket Nos. 16788, 27036., United States Board of Tax Appeals, 21 B.T.A. 661; 1930 BTA LEXIS 1814, December 12, 1930, Promulgated
    • W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 36604., United States Board of Tax Appeals, 27 B.T.A. 1056; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1258, Apr. 3, 1933, Promulgated
    • Estate of Sheaffer v. Commissioner, No. 17075, United States Court of Appeals EIGHTH CIRCUIT, 313 F.2d 738; 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6166; 63-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9272; 4 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839; 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 839, Feb. 13, 1963 , Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied, Reported at 375 U.S. 818. Petition for Rehearing Denied, March 6, 1963.
    • Estate of Sheaffer v. Commissioner, Docket No. 4146-64., United States TAX COURT, T.C. Memo 1966-126; 1966 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 156; 25 T.C.M. (CCH) 646; T.C.M. (RIA) 66126, June 10, 1966
WATERMAN
  1. Waterman et al. v. Shipman et al. Supreme Court, General Term, Second Dept.. Feb. 12, 1890.
  2. Waterman v. Mackenzie et al. (138U. 8.252, 11 S.Ct. 334, 34 L.Ed. 923 ) (Feb. 2, 1891.)
  3. Waterman v. Shipman, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of New York, 130 N.Y. 301; 29 N.E. 111; 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1271, October 29, 1891, Argued , December 8, 1891, Decided
  4. Waterman v. Shipman, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 55 F. 982; 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037, Apr. 18, 1893
  5. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Waterman, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 27 A.D. 133; 50 N.Y.S. 131; 1898 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 593, March, 1898, Decided
  6. Waterman v. Waterman
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Waterman, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 40 A.D. 530; 58 N.Y.S. 168; 1899 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1161, May, 1899, Decided
    •  L. E. Waterman Co. v. Waterman, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 29 A.D. 630; 52 N.Y.S. 1144; 1898 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1201, May, 1898, Decided , Decision without Published Opinion
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Waterman, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 27 A.D. 133; 50 N.Y.S. 131; 1898 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 593, March, 1898, Decided
  7. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Vassar College, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 99 F. 564; 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5045, Jan. 26, 1900
  8. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co., No. 25; No. 26, Circuit Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, 100 F. 544; 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5116, Feb. 16, 1900
  9. People ex rel. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Morgan, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 48 A.D. 395; 63 N.Y.S. 76; 1900 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 455, March, 1900, Decided
  10. In re L. E. Waterman Co., [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Special Term, Albany County, 33 Misc. 569; 68 N.Y.S. 892; 1901 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 13, January, 1901, Decided
  11. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co., No. 23, Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 107 F. 141; 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3689, March 22, 1901
  12. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Forsyth, No. 7,336, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 121 F. 103; 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5326, Jan. 7, 1903
  13. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Forsyth, No. 7,335, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 121 F. 107; 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5327, Jan. 7, 1903
  14. L. E. Waterman Co. v. McCutcheon (sp?), No. 6; No. 32, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 128 F. 926; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3991, Jan. 6, 1904
  15. L. E. Waterman Co. v. McCutchean, No. 7; No. 33, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 127 F. 1020; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3870, Jan. 6, 1904
  16. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Lockwood, No. 951; No. 1,223; No. 1,224, Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts, 128 F. 174; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4669, Feb. 8, 1904
  17. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Johnson, No. 1,221; No. 1,222, Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts, 128 F. 1023; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735, Feb. 8, 1904
  18. In re L. E. Waterman Co., No. 593., Court of Appeals of District of Columbia, 34 App. D.C. 185; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 6015, November 15, 1909, Submitted , December 7, 1909, Decided
  19. Waterman v. Modern Pen Co.
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., No. 208, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 197 F. 536; 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1311, June 7, 1912
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., Nos. 54, 72, Supreme Court of the United States, 235 U.S. 88; 35 S. Ct. 91; 59 L. Ed. 142; 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1005, Argued November 10, 1914 , November 30, 1914
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., No. 208, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 197 F. 534; 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1309, May 14, 1912
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., No. 208, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 197 F. 534; 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1310, May 28, 1912
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., No. 175, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 183 F. 118; 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025, November 14, 1910
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 193 F. 242; 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1779, Jan. 25, 1912
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., Nos. 54, 72, Supreme Court of the United States, 235 U.S. 88; 35 S. Ct. 91; 59 L. Ed. 142; 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1005, Argued November 10, 1914 , November 30, 1914
    • L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co., No. 175, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 183 F. 118; 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025, November 14, 1910
  20. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Standard Drug Co., No. 2615, Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, 222 F. 1023; 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1525, May 14, 1915
  21. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Kline, No. 1423, Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 234 F. 891; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152, July 7, 1916
  22. Chapman v. Waterman
    • Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co., [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 138 A.D. 897; 123 N.Y.S. 1110; 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1755, May, 1910, Decided , Decision without Published Opinion
    • Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co., [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 176 A.D. 697; 163 N.Y.S. 1059; 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5267, March 23, 1917
    • Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co., [No number in original], Court of Appeals of New York, 221 N.Y. 637; 117 N.E. 1064; 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1508, October 1, 1917, Argued , October 9, 1917, Decided
    • Chapman v. L. E. Waterman Co., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 180 A.D. 888; 166 N.Y.S. 1088; 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7500, October 11, 1917
  23. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Gordon, No. 489, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 72 F.2d 272; 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4522, July 16, 1934
  24. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Gordon, No. 353, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 76 F.2d 1013; 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2793, Apr. 4, 1935
  25. Dunn v. L. E. Waterman Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 22 F. Supp. 543; 1937 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1204, November 24, 1937
  26. Waterman-BIC Pen Corporation Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee, 332 F.2d 711, No. 409, Docket 28629, United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Apr. 9, 1964, Decided June 9, 1964.
ESTERBROOK
  1. The Morse Fountain Pen Company vs. The Esterbrook Steel Pen Manufacturing Company. In Equity. Case No. 9,862, Circuit Court, D. New Jersey, 17 F. Cas. 875; 1869 U.S. App. LEXIS 1336; 3 Fish. Pat. Cas. 515, March, 1869
  2. Washington Medalion Pen CO. v. Esterbrook, Case No. 17,246a, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 29 F. Cas. 366; 1869 U.S. App. LEXIS 1173; MS , 1869
  3. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co. v. Ahern, [No number in original], Court of CHANCERY of NEW JERSEY, 30 N.J. Eq. 341; 1879 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 95, February, 1879, Decided
  4. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co. v. Ahern, [No number in original], Court of CHANCERY of NEW JERSEY, 31 N.J. Eq. 3; 1879 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 55, May, 1879, Decided
  5. Gillott v. Esterbrook, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of NEW YORK, 48 N.Y. 374; 1872 N.Y. LEXIS 297, Sep. 29, 1871, Argued , Jan. Term, 1872, Decided
  6. Elizabethtown Sav. Institution v. Gerber, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF NEW JERSEY, 35 N.J. Eq. 153; 1882 N.J. LEXIS 139, March, 1882, Decided
  7. Penmac Corp. v. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 27 F. Supp. 86; 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2817; 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 263, March 31, 1939
  8. Penmac Corp. v. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co., No. 140, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 108 F.2d 695; 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114; 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 146, January 8, 1940
  9. Esterbrook Pen Co. v. San Juan F. Vilarino 5 y 10, Inc., Civ. No. 9185, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO, SAN JUAN DIVISION, 144 F. Supp. 309; 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2757; 1956 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68,555, September 10, 1956
  10. Esterbrook Pen Co. v. United States, Civil Action No. 156-59., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4499; 60-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9609; 6 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5123, July 7, 1960.
  11. F. B. VANDEGRIFT & CO. v. UNITED STATES, Protests 63/5941 and 63/5949 against the decision of the collector of customs at the port of Philadelphia, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS COURT, SECOND DIVISION, 59 Cust. Ct. 438; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2136; Cust. Dec. 3181, October 31, 1967
  12. Also trying to figure out
    1. Zephyr American Corporation v. The Esterbrook Pen Company, 135 USPQ 85 (TT & A Bd., 1962)

 

WIRT
  1. Wirt v. Farrelly, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 84 F. 891; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2705, Feb. 9, 1898
  2. Wirt v. Hicks, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 46 F. 71; 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1213, Apr. 16, 1891
  3. Wirt v. Hicks, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 45 F. 256; 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1740, Feb. 23, 1891
  4. Wirt v. Brown, Circuit Court, E.D. New York, 32 F. 283; 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2752, Sep. 19, 1887
EAGLE PENCIL CO
  1. Eagle Pencil Co. v. American Lead Pencil Co., Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 53 F. 388; 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 2036, December 17, 1892
  2. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Eagle Pencil Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 55 F.2d 420; 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1953, December 3, 1931

======================= HERE =========================

MISC
  1. Sackett v. Smith, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 42 F. 846; 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2254, May 13, 1890
  2. Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co., No. 139, Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 145 F. 933; 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4052, March 16, 1906
  3. Cushman v. Atlantis Fountain Pen Co., No. 406, Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts, 164 F. 94; 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5290, July 23, 1908
  4. Lancaster v. Witte, Circuit Court, D. Maryland, 175 F. 976; 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5243, Jan. 22, 1910
  5. Schrader & Ehlers v. United States, No. 5,178, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 180 F. 953; 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5541, July 1, 1910
  6. Schrader & Ehlers v. United States, Nos. 686 And 71811 Reported in T. D. 32169 (22 Treas. Dec., 70)., United States Court of Customs APPEALS, 2 Ct. Cust. 410; 1912 Ct. Cust. LEXIS 8; T.D. 32169, Jan. 11, 1912, Decided
  7. Schrader & Ehlers v. United States, No. 106811 Reported in T. D. 33373 (24 Treas. Dec., 599)., United States Court of Customs APPEALS, 4 Ct. Cust. 100; 1913 Ct. Cust. LEXIS 53; T.D. 33373, Apr. 22, 1913, Decided
  8. Brandt v. Louis K. Liggett Co., No. 394, District Court, D. Massachusetts, 212 F. 187; 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1024, March 21, 1914
  9. Write Away Pen Co. v. Buckner, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of Missouri, Kansas City, 188 Mo. App. 259; 175 S.W. 81; 1915 Mo. App. LEXIS 72, Apr. 5, 1915, Decided
  10. Taylor Feed Pen Co. v. Taylor Nat'l Bank, No. 92-2912., Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A, 215 S.W. 850; 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1072, November 12, 1919, Decided
  11. In re Application of New York, etc., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div. 1st Dept., 204 A.D. 868; 197 N.Y.S. 939; 1922 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9267, December, 1922
  12. Taylor Feed Pen Co. v. Taylor Nat'l Bank, No. 5468.** Writ of error Pending in Supreme Court., Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin, 181 S.W. 534; 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 1195, October 20, 1915, Decided , Rehearing Denied December 22, 1915.
  13. Taylor Feed Pen Co. v. Taylor Nat'l Bank, No. 5468., Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin, 177 S.W. 176; 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 647, Apr. 7, 1915, Decided , Rehearing Denied May 19, 1915.
  14. United States v. Illfelder & Co., No. 191311 T. D. 37901 (36 Treas. Dec. 70)., United States Court of Customs APPEALS, 9 Ct. Cust. 40; 1919 Ct. Cust. LEXIS 2; T.D. 37901, October 29, 1918, Oral argument by Mr. Hanson , Jan. 28, 1919, Decided
  15. Stedman v. Puritan Rubber Mfg. Co., No. 3482, Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 16 F.2d 742; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3940, December 7, 1926
  16. In re Dann, No. 2594, United States Court of Customs And PATENT APPEALS, 18 C.C.P.A. 1031; 47 F.2d 356; 1931 CCPA LEXIS 99, Jan. 13, 1931, Oral argument by Mr. Tew And Mr. Miller , March 2, 1931, Decided
  17. Penmac Corporation et al. v. Falcon Pencil Corporation, District Court, S.D. New York, 28 F. Supp. 639; 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2383; 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 182, July 25, 1939
  18. RITE-RITE MFG. CO. v. RITE-CRAFT CO., 181 F.2d 226, Patent Appeals No. 5667, United States Court of Customs And Patent Appeals, Apr. 3, 1950
  19. Russell T. WING And Zoe E. Wing, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 278 F.2d 656, 60-2 USTC P 9492, 125 U.S.P.Q. 618, No. 16397, United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit, June 2, 1960.
  20. Application of Nathan R. CLINE, 345 F.2d 847, Patent Appeal No. 7417, United States Court of Customs And Patent Appeals, June 4, 1965. Rehearing Denied July 1, 1965


WAHL-EVERSHARP

  1. Reynolds International Pen Co. v. Eversharp, Inc., Civil Action No. 739, United States District Court For the District of Delaware, 63 F. Supp. 423; 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1711; 68 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 158, November 17, 1945
  2. Reynolds International Pen Co. v. Eversharp, Inc.., Civil Action No. 739, United States District Court For the District of Delaware, 5 F.R.D. 382; 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1564; 70 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 294, July 8, 1946
  3. Wahl v. Commissioner, Docket No. 25770, United States TAX COURT, 19 T.C. 651; 1953 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 261, Jan. 12, 1953, Promulgated
  4. Kimberly Corp. v. Hartley Pen Co., No. 14701, United States Court of Appeals NINTH CIRCUIT, 237 F.2d 294; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5467; 111 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 67, Sep. 10, 1956
  5. Preis v. Eversharp, Inc., Civ. No. 15046, United States District Court For the EASTERN District of NEW YORK, 154 F. Supp. 98; 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3060, July 23, 1957
  6. Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co., Civ. A. No. 56 C 77, United States District Court For the NORTHERN District of ILLINOIS, EASTERN Div., 204 F. Supp. 649; 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5951; 132 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 423, November 7, 1961

 

CROSS
  1. Cross v. Livermore, Circuit Court, D. Rhode Island, 9 F. 607; 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2056, 1881
  2. Cross v. Mackinnon, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 11 F. 601; 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2443; 20 Blatchf. 395, March 8, 1882


McKINNON
  1.  Cross v. Mackinnon, Circuit Court, S.D. New York, 11 F. 601; 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2443; 20 Blatchf. 395, March 8, 1882
  2. Mackinnon Pen Co. v. Fountain Ink Co., [No number in original], Court of Appeals of NEW YORK, 93 N.Y. 658; 1883 N.Y. LEXIS 378, October 16, 1883, Argued , October 26, 1883, Decided, Decision without Published Opinion
     

HUNT PEN CO.

  1. C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Radiant Point Pen Corp., No. 172, United States Court of Appeals For the SECOND CIRCUIT, 135 F.2d 870; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3437; 57 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 429, May 22, 1943
  2. Radiant Point Pen Corp. v. C. Howard Hunt Pen Co., Supreme Court of the United States, 320 U.S. 773; 64 S. Ct. 80; 88 L. Ed. 464; 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1231; 59 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 495, October 18, 1943.
  3. C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade Com., No. 10479, United States Court of Appeals Third CIRCUIT, 197 F.2d 273; 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459; 1952 Trade Cas. (CCH) P67,286, November 19, 1951, Argued , May 27, 1952, Decided
  4. C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 10437., United States Board of Tax Appeals, 10 B.T.A. 900; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4008, Feb. 20, 1928, Promulgated

JOHN HOLLAND

  1.  John Holland Gold Pen Co. v. Williams & Co., 2052., Court of Appeals of GEORGIA, 7 Ga. App. 173; 66 S.E. 540; 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, November 18, 1909, Submitted , December 10, 1909, Decided

  2. JOHN HOLLAnd GOLD Pen CO. v. ROBBERT OPTICAL CO., 5203., Court of Appeals of LOUISIANA, ORLEANS PARISH, 8 Teiss. 180; 1911 La. App. LEXIS 24, Feb. 20, 1911, Decided
  3. John HollAnd Gold Pen Co. v. Juengling, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of Ohio, 1st Appellate District, Hamilton County, 2 Ohio App. 20; 1913 Ohio App. LEXIS 236; 21 Ohio C.A. 593, March 22, 1913, Decided
  4. John HollAnd Gold Pen Co. v. Juengling, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of Ohio, 1st Appellate District, Hamilton County, 2 Ohio App. 20; 1913 Ohio App. LEXIS 236; 21 Ohio C.A. 593, March 22, 1913, Decided

SPENCERIAN

  1. People ex rel. Spencerian Pen Co. v. Kelsey, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of New York, 185 N.Y. 546; 77 N.E. 1195; 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 956, Apr. 18, 1906, Argued , May 8, 1906, Decided

  2. People ex rel. Spencerian Pen Co. v. Kelsey, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 105 A.D. 132; 93 N.Y.S. 971; 1905 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2023, May, 1905, Decided


NEW DIAMOND POINT

WORTH v. NEW DIAMOND POINT Pen CO., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div. 1st Dept., 222 A.D. 730; 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8571, December, 1927

DUNN

People ex rel. Dunn--Pen Co. v. Wilcox, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div. 1st Dept., 203 A.D. 887; 196 N.Y.S. 945; 1922 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7841, November, 1922
Dunn v. L. E. Waterman Co., District Court, S.D. New York, 22 F. Supp. 543; 1937 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1204, November 24, 1937

STANDARD & VULCANITE Pen CO
Hardman Tire & Rubber Co. v. Standard & Vulcanite Pen Co., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 187 A.D. 945; 174 N.Y.S. 905; 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6096, March 7, 1919
Hardman Tire & Rubber Co. v. Standard & Vulcanite Pen Co., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 186 A.D. 944; 173 N.Y.S. 909; 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7662, December 13, 1918
Hardman Tire & Rubber Co. v. Standard Vulcanite Pen Co., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., 1st Dept., 185 A.D. 926; 172 N.Y.S. 895; 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7013, October 18, 1918
Lotz v. Standard Vulcanite Pen Co., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., SECOND Dept., 183 A.D. 904; 169 N.Y.S. 1102; 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4751, March 15, 1918

CROCKER

  1. CROCKER Pen CO. v. CARTER, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 170 N.Y.S. 1074; 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5273, May 8, 1918
CARTER
  1. CROCKER Pen CO. v. CARTER, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 170 N.Y.S. 1074; 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5273, May 8, 1918


PARKER
 

  1. Legal Tender Cases, Supreme Court of the United States, 79 U.S. 457; 20 L. Ed. 287; 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1220; 12 Wall. 457, May 1, 1871, Decided; DECEMBER, 1870, Term
  2. Den v. Baskerville, Supreme Court of the United States, 52 U.S. 329; 13 L. Ed. 717; 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1514; 11 HOW 329, March 10, 1851, Decided; December 1850 Term
  3. Parker v. United States, No. 5897, Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 88 F.2d 907; 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3275; 37-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9137; 19 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 215, Feb. 24, 1937
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Parker Pen Co., No. 23, Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 107 F. 141; 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3689, March 22, 1901
  5. L. E. Waterman v. Parker Pen Co., No. 25; No. 26, Circuit Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, 100 F. 544; 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 5116, Feb. 16, 1900
  6. Parker v. Culvertson, Case No. 10,732, Circuit Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, 18 F. Cas. 1122; 1846 U.S. App. LEXIS 547; 1 Wall. Jr. 149, October 20, 1846
  7. Parker Pen Co. v. Rex Mfg. Co., No. 226, District Court, D. Rhode Island, 11 F.2d 533; 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1012, March 6, 1926
  8. Parker Pen Co. v. Finstone, District Court, S.D. New York, 7 F.2d 753; 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1276, July 24, 1925
  9. Parker v. Commissioner, Docket No. 5602., United States Board of Tax Appeals, 10 B.T.A. 854; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4017, Feb. 17, 1928, Promulgated
  10. Cox v. Parker, 4 Div. 141., SUPREME Court of ALABAMA, 212 Ala. 35; 101 So. 657; 1924 Ala. LEXIS 79, October 23, 1924, Decided
  11. Parker v. Territory, Criminal No. 126, Supreme Court of Arizona, 5 Ariz. 283; 52 P. 361; 1898 Ariz. LEXIS 80, Feb. 23, 1898, Filed
  12. In re Estate of Holloway, L. A. No. 7932, Supreme Court of California, 195 Cal. 711; 235 P. 1012; 1925 Cal. LEXIS 409, Apr. 4, 1925
  13. People v. Parker, No. 20806, Supreme Court of California, 91 Cal. 91; 27 P. 537; 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1052, Sep. 7, 1891
  14. People v. Parker, Crim. No. 225, Court of APPEAL of CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, 119 Cal. App. 246; 6 P.2d 82; 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 81, December 16, 1931, Decided , A Petition for a Rehearing of this Cause was Denied by the District Court of Appeal on December 30, 1931, And an Application by Appellants to have the Cause Heard in the Supreme Court, after Judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was Denied by the Supreme Court on Jan. 14, 1932.
  15. People v. Singh, Crim. No. 1328, Court of APPEAL of CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, Div. ONE, 78 Cal. App. 488; 248 P. 986; 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 187, June 22, 1926, Decided
  16. People v. Singh, Crim. No. 1286, Court of APPEAL of CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, Div. ONE, 78 Cal. App. 476; 248 P. 981; 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 188, June 22, 1926, Decided
  17. People v. Parker, Crim. No. 1253, Court of APPEAL of CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, Div. TWO, 74 Cal. App. 540; 241 P. 401; 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 143, October 13, 1925, Decided
  18. Parker v. Hubble, No. 7492., SUPREME Court of INDIANA, 75 Ind. 580; 1881 Ind. LEXIS 324, May Term, 1881, Decided
  19. Parker v. Sexton & Son, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of IOWA, DES MOINES, 29 Iowa 421; 1870 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 139, June, 1870, Decided
  20. Hughes v. Parker, No. 12,655., SUPREME Court of KANSAS, 63 Kan. 297; 65 P. 265; 1901 Kan. LEXIS 139, January, 1901, Decided , June 8, 1901, Filed
  21. Parker v. McQueen, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of KENTUCKY, 47 Ky. 16; 1847 Ky. LEXIS 105; 8 B. Mon. 16, December 10, 1847, Decided
  22. Henderson's Lessee v. Parker, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of MARYLAND, 3 H. & J. 117; 1810 Md. LEXIS 25, December, 1810, Decided
  23. Parker v. Simpson, [No number in original], Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex, 180 Mass. 334; 62 N.E. 401; 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1081, December 4, 1900 , Jan. 4, 1902
  24. Stark v. Parker, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK And NANTUCKET, 19 Mass. 267; 1824 Mass. LEXIS 28; 2 Pick. 267, March, 1824, Decided
  25. People v. Parker, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of MICHIGAN, 67 Mich. 222; 34 N.W. 720; 1887 Mich. LEXIS 793, June 28, 1887, Argued , October 13, 1887, Decided
  26. ATWELL v. PARKER, Nos. 14,097 - (188), Supreme Court of Minnesota, 93 Minn. 462; 101 N.W. 946; 1904 Minn. LEXIS 756, December 16, 1904
  27. Parker v. Evans, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of Missouri, ST. LOUIS, 23 Mo. 67; 1856 Mo. LEXIS 80, March, 1856, Decided
  28.  International Bank of St. Louis v. Naughton, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of Missouri, ST. LOUIS, 88 Mo. App. 117; 1901 Mo. App. LEXIS 23, March 26, 1901, Decided
  29. Parker v. Oxendine, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of Missouri, KANSAS CITY, 85 Mo. App. 212; 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 419, Feb. 5, 1900, Decided ** NOTE.--This case received by the reporter November 20, 1900.
  30. Parker v. State, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of ARKANSAS, 98 Ark. 575; 137 S.W. 253; 1911 Ark. LEXIS 196, Apr. 10, 1911, Opinion Delivered
    Parker Pen Co. v. Wadsworth, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 127 A.D. 933; 111 N.Y.S. 1133; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4385, June, 1908, Decided , Decision without Published Opinion
  31. In re Parker's Will, [No number in original], Surrogate's Court of New York, St. Lawrence County, 130 Misc. 547; 225 N.Y.S. 203; 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1192, Sep. 23, 1927
  32. Moore v. Parker, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of NORTH CAROLINA, RALEIGH, 91 N.C. 275; 1884 N.C. LEXIS 62, October, 1884, Decided
  33. PARKER v. BOARD of EDUC. of CLEVELAND, [No number in original], STATE of OHIO, Court of COMMON PLEAS, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, 1884 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 96; 9 Ohio Dec. Reprint 335, Sep. 20, 1884, Decided
  34. Parker v. United States, [No number in original], Court of Appeals of INDIAN TERRITORY, 1 Indian Terr. 592; 43 S.W. 858; 1898 Indian Terr. LEXIS 80, Jan. 14, 1898, Decided
  35. Hausam v. Parker, No. 2567., SUPREME Court of OKLAHOMA, 31 Okla. 399; 121 P. 1063; 121 P. 1063; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 65, January, 1912, Decided , November 14, 1911, Opinion Filed , Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1912.
  36. Barton-Parker Mfg. Co. v. Miller Mercantile Co., [No number in original], SUPREME Court of OKLAHOMA, 18 Okla. 137; 89 P. 1128; 1907 Okla. LEXIS 97, January, 1907, Decided , Feb. 13, 1907, Filed
  37. Parker's Appeal, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of PenNSYLVANIA, 61 Pa. 478; 1869 Pa. LEXIS 199, March 26, 1869; March 27, 1869, Argued , May 11, 1869, Decided , Rehearing Granted 61 Pa. 478 at 486.
  38. Lee v. Parker, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of PenNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA, 5 Whart. 342; 1840 Pa. LEXIS 217, Feb. 24, 1840, Decided
  39. Chew v. Parker, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of PenNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA, 3 Rawle 283; 1832 Pa. LEXIS 59, Jan. 23, 1832, Decided
  40. Pennebaker v. Parker, No. 10, March T., 1907, SUPERIOR Court of PenNSYLVANIA, 33 Pa. Super. 458; 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320, March 12, 1907, Argued , Apr. 15, 1907, Decided
  41. Ex parte Parker, No. 3063, Court of CRIMINAL APPEALS of Texas, 48 Tex. Crim. 486; 88 S.W. 230; 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 239, June 24, 1905, Decided
  42. Kauffman v. Parker, No. 13580, Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth, 99 S.W.2d 1074; 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 1164, Nov. 20, 1936, Decided
  43. Bergere v. Parker, No. 355., Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, EL PASO, 170 S.W. 808; 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 980, October 29, 1914, Decided , Rehearing Denied November 19, 1914.
  44. Parker v. Busby, No. 6783., Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, GALVESTON, 170 S.W. 1042; 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 1009, October 28, 1914, Decided
  45. Parker v. Fairmont, [No number in original], SUPREME Court of Appeals of WEST VIRGINIA, CHARLESTON, 72 W. Va. 688; 79 S.E. 660; 1913 W. Va. LEXIS 111, June 11, 1912, Submitted , Sep. 23, 1913, Decided
  46. Strimple v. Parker Pen Co., [No number in original], SUPREME Court of WISCONSIN, 177 Wis. 111; 187 N.W. 1001; 1922 Wisc. LEXIS 248, March 15, 1922, Argued , May 9, 1922, Decided
  47. Parker Pen Co. v. Rex Mfg. Co., No. 226, District Court, D. Rhode Island, 11 F.2d 533; 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1012, March 6, 1926 18. Parker Pen Co. v. Finstone, District Court, S.D. New York, 7 F.2d 753; 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1276, July 24, 1925
  48. Parker Pen Co. v. Wadsworth, [No number in original], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Div., Third Dept., 127 A.D. 933; 111 N.Y.S. 1133; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4385, June, 1908, Decided , Decision without Published Opinion
  49. Strimple v. Parker Pen Co., [No number in original], SUPREME Court of WISCONSIN, 177 Wis. 111; 187 N.W. 1001; 1922 Wisc. LEXIS 248, March 15, 1922, Argued , May 9, 1922, Decided
     
MONTBLANC
  1.  Montblanc-Simplo GmbH v. Staples, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-10235-DPW, United States District Court For the District of MASSACHUSETTS, 172 F. Supp. 2d 231; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7905, May 3, 2001, Decided


CONKLIN
  1. CONKLIN Pen CO. v. BOWLES, Price Administrator, No. 243, United States EMERGENCY Court of Appeals, 152 F.2d 764; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 1863, at Chicago November 30, 1945, Heard, Jan. 11, 1946, Decided

PAPERMATE
 

Ashcroft v. Paper Mate Mfg. Co., No. 23328, United States Court of Appeals For the NINTH CIRCUIT, 434 F.2d 910; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6364; 168 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 66, November 18, 1970

SCRIPTO

  1. Scripto, Inc. v. Ferber Corp., Civ. No. 463-56, United States District Court For the District of NEW JERSEY, 163 F. Supp. 113; 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3931; 118 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 23, June 26, 1958

STARR
  1. Joseph STARR, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 226 F.2d 721, 55-2 USTC P 9731, No. 11299. United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. Nov. 2, 1955

  2. Jack STARR, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Samuel M. STARR, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 267 F.2d 148, 59-1 USTC P 9473, Nos. 12550, 12551, United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. May 20, 1959.

openjurist.org case-law.us bulk.resource.org/courts.gov
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
If you reached this page, chances are that you are interested in the history of fountain pens. Patents offer an interesting insight for the history of our beloved pens. You should consider purchasing George Kovalenko's book on Fountain Pen Patents 1911-1950s. Click here for more information. This is a labor of love and is the most comprehensive collection of pen patents that exists. George works currently on the first volume, which I am waiting anxiously for.